Book A Test Drive
Hackers Exploit Phony Charging Station WiFi to Hijack Teslas
Hackers Exploit Phony Charging Station WiFi to Hijack Teslas
Hackers Exploit Phony Charging Station WiFi to Hijack Teslas
Ramin Vandi
Ramin Vandi
March 13, 2024
March 13, 2024
In an eye-opening development, security researchers have uncovered a new technique that could potentially allow hackers to steal Teslas parked at charging stations. This method exploits Tesla owners' reliance on public WiFi networks, notably those named "Tesla Guest," commonly available at Tesla charging stations. The revelation comes from Tommy Mysk and Talal Haj Bakry of Mysk Inc., who detailed their findings in a striking YouTube demonstration, showcasing the vulnerability of Tesla's digital key system to a well-crafted social engineering attack.
The process described by Mysk and Bakry hinges on the creation of a deceptive "Tesla Guest" WiFi network using a Flipper Zero, a device priced at a modest $169, which acts as a lure to ensnare unsuspecting Tesla owners. Once connected, the victim is rerouted to a bogus Tesla login page, ingeniously designed to harvest the owner's credentials, including the all-important two-factor authentication (2FA) code. Alarmingly, this setup, while executed using a Flipper Zero for demonstration purposes, could feasibly be replicated with any wireless-capable device, amplifying the threat scope.
Armed with the stolen login information, the attacker can swiftly gain access to the genuine Tesla app, a critical step requiring prompt action to capitalize on the fleeting validity of the 2FA code. The Tesla app's functionality extends beyond mere vehicle tracking, enabling owners to use their smartphones as digital keys. This feature, while designed for convenience, inadvertently provides hackers with a backdoor, allowing them to register a new phone key and gain unfettered access to the vehicle without triggering any immediate alerts to the owner.
Despite Tesla's stringent security measures, including a stipulation in the Model 3 owner's manual mandating physical key card verification for new phone key setup, Mysk's experimentation revealed this to be a misnomer. This glaring oversight underscores the potential for significant security breaches, enabling attackers to not only unlock but also facilitate the theft of Tesla vehicles under the radar.
Mysk's disclosure of these findings to Tesla elicited a lukewarm response, with the company dismissing the reported vulnerability as non-critical. However, the ease with which this method can be exploited to compromise vehicle security calls for a reassessment of Tesla's digital key protocols. Implementing mandatory physical key card authentication for new phone key registrations and alerting owners of such changes could serve as mitigative steps to safeguard against such exploits.
This incident is not an isolated blip in Tesla's otherwise robust cybersecurity framework. Previous instances, including a 19-year-old accessing 25 Teslas globally and a security firm's remote Tesla hack, highlight the ongoing cat-and-mouse game between security researchers and Tesla's cybersecurity team.
As Tesla continues to innovate at the intersection of automotive engineering and cyber technology, the evolution of security threats necessitates a proactive, rather than reactive, approach to safeguarding against sophisticated social engineering attacks. For Tesla owners, this episode serves as a cautionary tale, emphasizing the importance of vigilance when connecting to public WiFi networks and the need for heightened awareness of the digital threats looming over modern automotive marvels.
The recent unveiling of a potential security vulnerability affecting Tesla vehicles shines a stark light on the risks associated with digital key technologies and public WiFi networks. Security researchers Tommy Mysk and Talal Haj Bakry have demonstrated a method that could leave Tesla owners vulnerable to having their vehicles stolen right from under their noses. This alarming revelation was made through a meticulously crafted social engineering scheme, exploiting the trust Tesla owners place in the seemingly innocuous "Tesla Guest" WiFi networks provided at charging stations.
The crux of this vulnerability lies in the replication of such WiFi networks using readily accessible hacking tools like the Flipper Zero. Victims, drawn into connecting with these counterfeit networks, are then redirected to a fraudulent Tesla login page, expertly designed to capture their login credentials along with the crucial two-factor authentication code. The simplicity of this method, coupled with the ubiquity of devices capable of setting up similar traps, creates a broad spectrum of risk that Tesla owners need to be aware of.
Once in possession of these credentials, an attacker can quickly gain access to a Tesla, bypassing the digital safeguards meant to protect it. Remarkably, the findings highlighted by Mysk and Bakry question the effectiveness of Tesla's reliance on digital keys, revealing that the addition of a new phone key to a vehicle could be carried out without alerting the owner or requiring the physical key card typically necessary for such actions.
Tesla's lukewarm response to the discovery of this loophole has sparked concerns among the automotive and cybersecurity communities. Despite the researchers' proactive efforts to highlight this flaw, Tesla has deemed it not to be an issue of immediate concern. However, the potential for malicious exploitation suggests a pressing need for Tesla to reassess its security protocols to prevent unauthorized access to its vehicles.
This incident is not Tesla's first encounter with security challenges. The innovative automaker has previously navigated through various vulnerabilities discovered by both hobbyist and professional security researchers. Each instance serves as a reminder of the constant vigilance required to protect against the ingenuity of hackers.
To mitigate the risk posed by this new threat, Tesla could consider implementing more stringent authentication measures for setting up new phone keys and improving notification systems to alert owners of changes made to their vehicle's digital access settings. Additionally, Tesla owners should exercise caution when connecting to public WiFi networks, particularly those at charging stations, and remain alert to the potential for phishing attempts disguised as legitimate login pages.
As we forge ahead into an era where vehicles are increasingly reliant on digital technologies for security and convenience, it becomes crucial for automakers like Tesla to stay a step ahead of those who seek to exploit these advancements. The balance between innovation and security remains a delicate one, requiring ongoing effort to ensure that our vehicles remain safe from both physical and cyber threats.
In an eye-opening development, security researchers have uncovered a new technique that could potentially allow hackers to steal Teslas parked at charging stations. This method exploits Tesla owners' reliance on public WiFi networks, notably those named "Tesla Guest," commonly available at Tesla charging stations. The revelation comes from Tommy Mysk and Talal Haj Bakry of Mysk Inc., who detailed their findings in a striking YouTube demonstration, showcasing the vulnerability of Tesla's digital key system to a well-crafted social engineering attack.
The process described by Mysk and Bakry hinges on the creation of a deceptive "Tesla Guest" WiFi network using a Flipper Zero, a device priced at a modest $169, which acts as a lure to ensnare unsuspecting Tesla owners. Once connected, the victim is rerouted to a bogus Tesla login page, ingeniously designed to harvest the owner's credentials, including the all-important two-factor authentication (2FA) code. Alarmingly, this setup, while executed using a Flipper Zero for demonstration purposes, could feasibly be replicated with any wireless-capable device, amplifying the threat scope.
Armed with the stolen login information, the attacker can swiftly gain access to the genuine Tesla app, a critical step requiring prompt action to capitalize on the fleeting validity of the 2FA code. The Tesla app's functionality extends beyond mere vehicle tracking, enabling owners to use their smartphones as digital keys. This feature, while designed for convenience, inadvertently provides hackers with a backdoor, allowing them to register a new phone key and gain unfettered access to the vehicle without triggering any immediate alerts to the owner.
Despite Tesla's stringent security measures, including a stipulation in the Model 3 owner's manual mandating physical key card verification for new phone key setup, Mysk's experimentation revealed this to be a misnomer. This glaring oversight underscores the potential for significant security breaches, enabling attackers to not only unlock but also facilitate the theft of Tesla vehicles under the radar.
Mysk's disclosure of these findings to Tesla elicited a lukewarm response, with the company dismissing the reported vulnerability as non-critical. However, the ease with which this method can be exploited to compromise vehicle security calls for a reassessment of Tesla's digital key protocols. Implementing mandatory physical key card authentication for new phone key registrations and alerting owners of such changes could serve as mitigative steps to safeguard against such exploits.
This incident is not an isolated blip in Tesla's otherwise robust cybersecurity framework. Previous instances, including a 19-year-old accessing 25 Teslas globally and a security firm's remote Tesla hack, highlight the ongoing cat-and-mouse game between security researchers and Tesla's cybersecurity team.
As Tesla continues to innovate at the intersection of automotive engineering and cyber technology, the evolution of security threats necessitates a proactive, rather than reactive, approach to safeguarding against sophisticated social engineering attacks. For Tesla owners, this episode serves as a cautionary tale, emphasizing the importance of vigilance when connecting to public WiFi networks and the need for heightened awareness of the digital threats looming over modern automotive marvels.
The recent unveiling of a potential security vulnerability affecting Tesla vehicles shines a stark light on the risks associated with digital key technologies and public WiFi networks. Security researchers Tommy Mysk and Talal Haj Bakry have demonstrated a method that could leave Tesla owners vulnerable to having their vehicles stolen right from under their noses. This alarming revelation was made through a meticulously crafted social engineering scheme, exploiting the trust Tesla owners place in the seemingly innocuous "Tesla Guest" WiFi networks provided at charging stations.
The crux of this vulnerability lies in the replication of such WiFi networks using readily accessible hacking tools like the Flipper Zero. Victims, drawn into connecting with these counterfeit networks, are then redirected to a fraudulent Tesla login page, expertly designed to capture their login credentials along with the crucial two-factor authentication code. The simplicity of this method, coupled with the ubiquity of devices capable of setting up similar traps, creates a broad spectrum of risk that Tesla owners need to be aware of.
Once in possession of these credentials, an attacker can quickly gain access to a Tesla, bypassing the digital safeguards meant to protect it. Remarkably, the findings highlighted by Mysk and Bakry question the effectiveness of Tesla's reliance on digital keys, revealing that the addition of a new phone key to a vehicle could be carried out without alerting the owner or requiring the physical key card typically necessary for such actions.
Tesla's lukewarm response to the discovery of this loophole has sparked concerns among the automotive and cybersecurity communities. Despite the researchers' proactive efforts to highlight this flaw, Tesla has deemed it not to be an issue of immediate concern. However, the potential for malicious exploitation suggests a pressing need for Tesla to reassess its security protocols to prevent unauthorized access to its vehicles.
This incident is not Tesla's first encounter with security challenges. The innovative automaker has previously navigated through various vulnerabilities discovered by both hobbyist and professional security researchers. Each instance serves as a reminder of the constant vigilance required to protect against the ingenuity of hackers.
To mitigate the risk posed by this new threat, Tesla could consider implementing more stringent authentication measures for setting up new phone keys and improving notification systems to alert owners of changes made to their vehicle's digital access settings. Additionally, Tesla owners should exercise caution when connecting to public WiFi networks, particularly those at charging stations, and remain alert to the potential for phishing attempts disguised as legitimate login pages.
As we forge ahead into an era where vehicles are increasingly reliant on digital technologies for security and convenience, it becomes crucial for automakers like Tesla to stay a step ahead of those who seek to exploit these advancements. The balance between innovation and security remains a delicate one, requiring ongoing effort to ensure that our vehicles remain safe from both physical and cyber threats.
In an eye-opening development, security researchers have uncovered a new technique that could potentially allow hackers to steal Teslas parked at charging stations. This method exploits Tesla owners' reliance on public WiFi networks, notably those named "Tesla Guest," commonly available at Tesla charging stations. The revelation comes from Tommy Mysk and Talal Haj Bakry of Mysk Inc., who detailed their findings in a striking YouTube demonstration, showcasing the vulnerability of Tesla's digital key system to a well-crafted social engineering attack.
The process described by Mysk and Bakry hinges on the creation of a deceptive "Tesla Guest" WiFi network using a Flipper Zero, a device priced at a modest $169, which acts as a lure to ensnare unsuspecting Tesla owners. Once connected, the victim is rerouted to a bogus Tesla login page, ingeniously designed to harvest the owner's credentials, including the all-important two-factor authentication (2FA) code. Alarmingly, this setup, while executed using a Flipper Zero for demonstration purposes, could feasibly be replicated with any wireless-capable device, amplifying the threat scope.
Armed with the stolen login information, the attacker can swiftly gain access to the genuine Tesla app, a critical step requiring prompt action to capitalize on the fleeting validity of the 2FA code. The Tesla app's functionality extends beyond mere vehicle tracking, enabling owners to use their smartphones as digital keys. This feature, while designed for convenience, inadvertently provides hackers with a backdoor, allowing them to register a new phone key and gain unfettered access to the vehicle without triggering any immediate alerts to the owner.
Despite Tesla's stringent security measures, including a stipulation in the Model 3 owner's manual mandating physical key card verification for new phone key setup, Mysk's experimentation revealed this to be a misnomer. This glaring oversight underscores the potential for significant security breaches, enabling attackers to not only unlock but also facilitate the theft of Tesla vehicles under the radar.
Mysk's disclosure of these findings to Tesla elicited a lukewarm response, with the company dismissing the reported vulnerability as non-critical. However, the ease with which this method can be exploited to compromise vehicle security calls for a reassessment of Tesla's digital key protocols. Implementing mandatory physical key card authentication for new phone key registrations and alerting owners of such changes could serve as mitigative steps to safeguard against such exploits.
This incident is not an isolated blip in Tesla's otherwise robust cybersecurity framework. Previous instances, including a 19-year-old accessing 25 Teslas globally and a security firm's remote Tesla hack, highlight the ongoing cat-and-mouse game between security researchers and Tesla's cybersecurity team.
As Tesla continues to innovate at the intersection of automotive engineering and cyber technology, the evolution of security threats necessitates a proactive, rather than reactive, approach to safeguarding against sophisticated social engineering attacks. For Tesla owners, this episode serves as a cautionary tale, emphasizing the importance of vigilance when connecting to public WiFi networks and the need for heightened awareness of the digital threats looming over modern automotive marvels.
The recent unveiling of a potential security vulnerability affecting Tesla vehicles shines a stark light on the risks associated with digital key technologies and public WiFi networks. Security researchers Tommy Mysk and Talal Haj Bakry have demonstrated a method that could leave Tesla owners vulnerable to having their vehicles stolen right from under their noses. This alarming revelation was made through a meticulously crafted social engineering scheme, exploiting the trust Tesla owners place in the seemingly innocuous "Tesla Guest" WiFi networks provided at charging stations.
The crux of this vulnerability lies in the replication of such WiFi networks using readily accessible hacking tools like the Flipper Zero. Victims, drawn into connecting with these counterfeit networks, are then redirected to a fraudulent Tesla login page, expertly designed to capture their login credentials along with the crucial two-factor authentication code. The simplicity of this method, coupled with the ubiquity of devices capable of setting up similar traps, creates a broad spectrum of risk that Tesla owners need to be aware of.
Once in possession of these credentials, an attacker can quickly gain access to a Tesla, bypassing the digital safeguards meant to protect it. Remarkably, the findings highlighted by Mysk and Bakry question the effectiveness of Tesla's reliance on digital keys, revealing that the addition of a new phone key to a vehicle could be carried out without alerting the owner or requiring the physical key card typically necessary for such actions.
Tesla's lukewarm response to the discovery of this loophole has sparked concerns among the automotive and cybersecurity communities. Despite the researchers' proactive efforts to highlight this flaw, Tesla has deemed it not to be an issue of immediate concern. However, the potential for malicious exploitation suggests a pressing need for Tesla to reassess its security protocols to prevent unauthorized access to its vehicles.
This incident is not Tesla's first encounter with security challenges. The innovative automaker has previously navigated through various vulnerabilities discovered by both hobbyist and professional security researchers. Each instance serves as a reminder of the constant vigilance required to protect against the ingenuity of hackers.
To mitigate the risk posed by this new threat, Tesla could consider implementing more stringent authentication measures for setting up new phone keys and improving notification systems to alert owners of changes made to their vehicle's digital access settings. Additionally, Tesla owners should exercise caution when connecting to public WiFi networks, particularly those at charging stations, and remain alert to the potential for phishing attempts disguised as legitimate login pages.
As we forge ahead into an era where vehicles are increasingly reliant on digital technologies for security and convenience, it becomes crucial for automakers like Tesla to stay a step ahead of those who seek to exploit these advancements. The balance between innovation and security remains a delicate one, requiring ongoing effort to ensure that our vehicles remain safe from both physical and cyber threats.
